Different regimes of stripe fluctuations in the superconducting cuprates (in English)
Abstract
The complementary NMR and ESR studies of the frustrated phase separation in different superconducting cuprates are reported. We specially address the temperature dependence of the magnetic fluctuations and discuss their link with the observed superconducting state. It is argued that according to the phase diagram obtained for the lanthanum cuprates the superconducting phase coexists with the developed antiferromagnetic correlations. The observed picture is strongly dependent on the hole doping. In the vicinity of 1/8 doping such a coexistence may be realized in a form of dynamic stripes – the corresponding enhancement of the spin-stiffness reveals the plane character of the spin (and charge) inhomogeneities. Depending on whether these inhomogeneities are pinned or not, one has to distinguish the static and dynamical regimes of stripe fluctuations. With a help of our spin stiffness estimations, the upper threshold values of this quantity critical for the superconducting state were determined. The NMR analysis of the stripe phase local properties made it possible to estimate the local magnetic moment corresponding to antiferromagnetic domains as well as the charge of the domain walls.
Supporting agencies: This work was supported by RFBR through the Grant N 01-02-17533.
About the Author
G. B. Teitel'baum
Institute for Technical Physics of the RAS
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
420029 Kazan
References
1. L.P. Gor’kov, A.V.Sokol, JETP Lett. 46 (1987) 420
2. D. Poilblanc and T.M. Rice, Phys. Rev., B 39, (1989) 9749; J. Zaanen and O. Gunnarson, Phys. Rev., B 40, (1989) 7391.
3. J.M. Tranquada et al., Nature, 375, (1995) 561.
4. J.M. Tranquada, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 59, (1998) 2150.
5. H.A. Mook et al., Nature 395, (1998) 580.
6. H.P. Fong et al., cond-mat/9902262.
7. A.W. Hunt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, (1999) 4300.
8. G.B. Teitel’baum et al, Phys.Rev.B 63 (2001) 020507(R).
9. G.B. Teitel'baum et al, Phys.Rev.Lett., 84, (2000) 2949.
10. B. Büchner et al., Physica, 185-189C, (1991) 903; Europhys. Lett., 21, (1993) 953.
11. T. Shimizu, J.Phys. Soc. Jpn., 62, (1993) 772.
12. R.L. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett., 75, (1995) 744.
13. T. Tsuda et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 57, (1988) 2908.
14. T. Imai et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 70, (1993) 1002.
15. G.M. Luke et al., Hyp. Int., 105, (1997) 113.
16. M. Vojta, S. Sachdev, cond-mat/9906104.
17. B. Büchner et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 73, (1994) 1841.
18. K. Yoshimura et al., Hyp. Int., 79, (1993) 867; S. Oshugi et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 63, (1994) 2057.
19. P.C. Hammel et al., Phys. Rev. B 57, (1998) R712.
20. J.M. Tranquada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 78 (1997) 338.
21. T. Suzuki et al., Phys.Rev.B 57 (1998) R3229.
22. K. Yamada et al, Phys Rev B 57 (1998) 6165.
23. P. Kuhns et al., Proc. of the Physical Phenomena in High Magnetic Fields-IV. Santa Fe, NM, World Scientific (2002), 297.
24. G.B. Teitel'baum et al., JETP Lett 72 (2003) 726.
25. V. Kataev et al., Phys Rev B 58 (1998) R11876.
26. S.E. Barnes, Adv. Phys. 30 (1981) 801.
27. V. Kataev et al, JETP Lett, 56 (1992) 385; Phys. Rev. B 48 (1993) 13042.
28. D.P. Arovas et al., Phys Rev Lett 79 (1997) 2871.
29. B. Lake et al., Science 291 (2001) 832.
30. B.Z. Rameev et al, Physica C 246 (1995) 309.
31. S. Oshugi et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 63 (1994) 2057.
32. T. Goto et al, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 66 (1997) 2870.
Review
For citations:
Teitel'baum G.B. Different regimes of stripe fluctuations in the superconducting cuprates (in English). Magnetic Resonance in Solids. 2004;6(1):221-228.
Views:
25
Email this article 